What are the different shapes of catalysts?
Main forms of catalysts
|
form
|
Process characteristics
|
|
powder
|
Micron/nano-scale fine powders are usually synthesized directly by chemical methods such as precipitation and hydrothermal processes.
|
|
Granules
|
Irregularly shaped solid lumps are made by pressing powder into tablets or rolling them through a granulator, followed by calcination.
|
|
Columnar/cylindrical
|
Regular cylindrical shapes are formed by extruding a mixture of catalyst powder and binder, followed by cutting and calcination.
|
|
Clover/four-leaf clover and other irregularly shaped stripes
|
It is a strip with multiple raised leaf-like lobes, which is extruded by a special mold.
|
|
spherical
|
Perfect spheres are produced by oil column molding, spray granulation, or rolling granulation.
|
|
honeycomb filter element
|
The integral structure has a large number of parallel, regular straight channels (the appearance can be cubic, cylindrical, etc.), and the carrier includes cordierite, activated carbon, etc. (the carrier is coated with a catalytic coating or sprayed with powder).
|
|
Other filter element structures
|
An irregular porous structure made of metal or ceramic, with catalyst coated within the pores. Examples include corrugated metal sheets, metal foam, and fiber felt.
|
Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of each form
|
form
|
Core advantages
|
|
powder
|
It has the largest specific surface area, the most complete exposure of active sites, and the highest intrinsic activity; it is easy to perform activity screening in the laboratory.
|
|
Particles
|
It has high strength and good wear resistance; it is easy to fill and has a large bed porosity, which is conducive to gas-liquid flow.
|
|
Columnar/cylindrical
|
It has a regular shape, uniform filling, and can reduce channeling; it has good mechanical strength; and the manufacturing process is mature.
|
|
Clover/four-leaf clover and other irregularly shaped stripes
|
For the same volume, the specific surface area is slightly larger than that of a cylinder; the blade structure enhances surface turbulence and improves mass transfer; the bed porosity is large, resulting in lower airflow pressure.
|
|
spherical
|
It is isotropic, has extremely high strength, and the best wear resistance; it has good fluidity and the most uniform distribution during filling; the bed pore structure is the most uniform and the air pressure is reduced.
|
|
honeycomb filter element
|
It has a huge geometric surface area; straight airflow channels and extremely low airflow pressure drop (1/10 to 1/20 of that of a particle bed); it is clogging-resistant (dust can pass through); and it is modular, making installation and replacement convenient.
|
|
Other filter element structures
|
It has extremely high porosity (>85%), low gas pressure, excellent mixing and mass transfer properties, and good thermal conductivity.
|
|
form
|
Main disadvantages
|
|
powder
|
Its strength is extremely low, making it unsuitable for use in fixed beds; it is easily carried away by airflow and difficult to separate from reactants.
|
|
Granules
|
Its irregular shape may result in uneven filling during loading; its specific surface area is slightly less than that of powder.
|
|
Columnar/cylindrical
|
For the same volume, the specific surface area is lower than that of irregular strips such as multileaf grass, and the gas flow pressure drop of the catalytic bed is relatively higher.
|
|
Clover/four-leaf clover and other irregularly shaped stripes
|
The mold cost is high; the edge lobes are relatively fragile, and their wear resistance and strength are not as good as those of the columnar type.
|
|
spherical
|
It typically has the highest manufacturing cost; its specific surface area is usually smaller than that of irregularly shaped strips of the same material.
|
|
honeycomb filter element
|
Poor axial heat transfer, unsuitable for strong exothermic/endothermic reactions; coating is at risk of peeling; high cost per unit.
|
|
Other filter element structures
|
The specific surface area is usually lower than that of honeycomb ceramics; the strength may be uneven; the cost is also relatively high, and it usually requires customization.
|
Typical applications of each form
|
form
|
Typical application areas
|
|
powder
|
Laboratory studies (activity evaluation); slurry bed reactors (e.g., suspension catalytic ozone oxidation of wastewater); catalytic filter bags (adhere powder to filter media).
|
|
Particles
|
It is widely compatible with various fixed-bed reactors and trickle-bed reactors (gas-liquid-solid three-phase); and is also suitable for certain applications of integrated adsorption and catalysis reaction equipment.
|
|
Columnar/cylindrical
|
The most widely used fixed-bed configuration, such as petrochemical hydrogenation, desulfurization, and VOCs catalytic combustion.
|
|
Clover/four-leaf clover and other irregularly shaped stripes
|
Reactions that are diffusion-controlled (mass transfer-limited) are crucial, such as heavy oil hydrocracking and diesel hydrorefining.
|
|
spherical
|
In applications where high gas pressure drop and bed uniformity are required, such as large radial reactors, strongly exothermic reactions, and moving bed reactors (where the catalyst needs to be recycled).
|
|
honeycomb filter element
|
Applications include high-volume, low-concentration, and low-pressure airflow scenarios, such as VOCs exhaust treatment and industrial denitrification in industrial emissions, three-way catalytic converters for automotive exhaust, and decomposition filters for formaldehyde and ozone purification in indoor spaces.
|
|
Other filter element structures
|
In special operating conditions, such as exhaust gas with high dust/oil mist content, foam metal filters are required. For strongly exothermic catalytic combustion, corrugated metal plates are used to facilitate heat conduction and dissipation.
|
Basis and Steps for Selecting Catalyst Species
Step 1: Preliminary screening based on reaction system and process conditions
1. Factors related to the phase state of reactants
For purely gas-phase reactions (such as VOCs catalytic combustion and automobile exhaust), honeycomb ceramic catalysts are the preferred choice because they perfectly match the requirements of "high volume and low pressure".
Three-phase gas-liquid-solid reactions (such as residual oil hydrogenation and wastewater catalytic wet oxidation): granular catalysts must be used to maintain the gas-liquid dispersion space , while powder will be lost and honeycomb will be blocked.
Liquid-solid two-phase reactions (such as catalytic oxidation of suspensions): only powdered catalysts or microsphere catalysts can be used to maximize the contact area.
2. Factors affecting pressure
For low-pressure applications (such as automotive engines and large ventilation systems) , honeycomb or foam metal catalysts are the best choice.
Under medium to high pressure conditions (such as high-pressure reactors and tubular reactors) , particulate catalysts can be selected to obtain better mass transfer and mixing.
3. Factors related to reaction heat
In the case of strongly exothermic/endothermic reactions, the catalyst bed needs to have good thermal conductivity to remove or supply heat and prevent local overheating/overcooling . In this case, metal-based catalysts with regular shapes (corrugated plates, foam boards ) or small spherical particles are preferred .
Step 2: Further consideration based on actual working conditions
1. Factors affecting the composition of exhaust gas
Most forms are usable in clean gas conditions , with the one with the largest surface area being preferred.
In cases involving dust, fibers, or colloids , a non-clogging morphology must be selected. Honeycomb types or large-pore metal foams are preferred to prevent clogging of the catalyst bed .
When multiple components are mixed, it is necessary to consider pretreatment in the process or the synergistic combination of multiple types of catalysts.
2、Factors of operation
applications requiring frequent regeneration (such as catalytic cracking) , microsphere catalysts are used for continuous reaction-regeneration in a fluidized bed.
requiring long-term operation and repeated rinsing , high-strength spherical or granular catalysts are the best choice.
For situations requiring regular inspection and replacement, modular honeycomb catalysts are the best choice .
3. Considerations of cost-effectiveness
Columnar, granular , and spherical shapes are already in large-scale industrial production , and their cost is the most advantageous.
low-to-medium air volume and low-pressure conditions, the unit price of honeycomb type is relatively high, but it is simpler to integrate into the exhaust system and has a high degree of customization to adapt to different equipment conditions . The overall installation, replacement and maintenance process is more efficient.
In extreme and complex operating conditions , special composite forms may need to be customized , which is the most expensive.
minstrong
minstrong